1. Adam Kučera. Petr Glos, T. P. (2013). Fault Detection in Building management system networks. Velke Karlovice: IFAC Conference on Programmable Devices and Embedded.
2. Aghemo, C., Blaso, L., & Pellegrino, A. (2014). Building automation and control systems: A case study to evaluate the energy and environmental performances of a lighting control system in offices. Automation in Construction, 43, 10-22.
3. Arianna Barmbilla, H. A. (2017). "Our inherent desire for control": a case study of automation's impact on the perception of comfort. Energy Procedia, 122, 925-930.
4. Barlex, M. J. (2006). Guide to Post Occupancy Evaluation. University of Westminster.
5. Bhatt, J. (2015). Design and Development ofWired Building Automation Systems. Energy and buildings.
6. Council, F. F. (2001). LEARNING FROM OUR BUILDINGS. Washington, D.C.: NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS.
7. Domingues, P., Carreira, P., Vieira, R., & Kastner, W. (2016). Building automation systems: Concepts and technology review. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 45, 1-12.
8. Gopikrishnan, S., & Topkar, V. M. (2017). Attributes and descriptors for building performance evaluation. Housing and Building National Research Center, 13, 291-296.
9. Groover, M. P. (2018). Automation. Retrieved april 2018, from https://www.britannica.com/technology/automation
10. Kao, J. Y. (1991). Direct Digital Control Based Building Automation System Design Criteria. U.S. Department of Commerce.
11. Khalil, N., Husin, H. N., Adnan, H., & Nawawi, A. H. (2009). Correlation Analysis of Building Performance and Occupant’s Satisfaction via Post Occupancy Evaluation for Malaysia’s Public Buildings. Istanbul: Fifth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century.
12. Kwon, M., Remøy, H., Dobbelsteen, A. v., & Knaack, U. (2019). Personal control and environmental user satisfaction in office buildings: Results of case studies in the Netherlands. Building and Environment, 149, 428-435.
13. Li, P., Froes, T. M., & G. B. (2018). Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review. Building and Environment.
14. Meir, I. A., Y. G., Jiao, D., & Cicelsky, A. (2009). Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Inevitable Step Toward Sustainability. Advances in Building Energy Research, 3, 189-219.
15. Pedro Domingues, P. C. (2016). Building automation systems: Concepts and technology review. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 45, 1-12.
16. Preiser, W. F. (1989). BUILDING EVALUATION. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
17. Preiser, W. F. (1995). Post-occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better. Facilities, 27, 21-33.
18. Riley, M., Moody, C., & Pitt, M. (2009). A REVIEW OF THE EVOLUTION OF POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION AS A VIABLE PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT TOOL. Liverpool: Liverpool Conference on the Built Environment and Natural Environment.
19. Wang, S. (2010). Intelligent Buildings and Building Automation. London: Spoon Press.
20. Way, M., & Bordass, B. (2007). Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 2: Soft landings – involving design and building teams in improving performance. Building Research & Information, 33(4), 353-360.
21. Zhang, G., Yang, J., & Sidwell, A. C. (2002). RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM: A PARADIGM OF FUTURE OFFICE BUILDING FITOUT? Advances in Building Technology, 2, 1577-1584.
22. Zimmerman, A., & Martin, M. (2010). Post-occupancy evaluation: benefits and barriers. Building Research & Information, 26(2), 168-174.
)
View on SCiNiTO