Smart heritage buildings as a tool to achieve tourism competitiveness

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant lecturer- Architecture department- HTI- Egypt

2 Associate Professor- Architecture department- Zagazige university- Egypt

3 Professor Architecture - Architecture department -Zagazig University- Egypt

Abstract

The competitiveness indicators of the tourism sector have been of great importance to international institutions for the role played by this sector in the economy. The appearance of architectural intelligence and information technology and communications has also led to increased competition in tourism projects. Here is the problem of research, heritage buildings suffered a lot of low competitiveness, since it does not rely on the smart system, and overlapping the competencies of the various ministries and lack of coordination among them, which adversely affected the competitiveness of tourism associated with buildings Heritage. As a result, the research aims to develop mechanisms to gain a competitive advantage by introducing intelligence as a tool that increases the competitiveness of heritage buildings ,The research is based on a common strategy between the descriptive approach and the analytical approach to the case study and the evaluation of the experience of introducing the characteristics of architectural intelligence as a competitive advantage to improve the efficiency of the heritage buildings, which is reflected in the visitors experience and the rate of visit to the heritage building.  Research Objective To develop mechanisms to increase the competitiveness of heritage buildings when rehabilitated by providing architectural features to enhance the efficiency of heritage buildings to achieve tourist competitiveness through high visits to the building and to provide good visitors experience.Research problem   The lack of achievement of heritage buildings for tourism competitiveness as a result of the low efficiency, which affects the provision of good visitors experience and the rate of visit to the building, and the impact on the economic and development benefits of the surrounding areas.Research Methodology: The research methodology consists of combined strategy as following: 1st :use Descriptive method To identify the concept of competitiveness of the tourism sector and Through identifying the concept of competitiveness of the tourism sector and the mechanisms of achieving the advantage of passive and identify each generation of generations of architectural intelligence features. Learn about the way to assess the intelligence of heritage buildings after the introduction of intelligence as a competitive advantage using the features of intelligence and the method of smart building index 2nd : use analytical method through the extraction of the features of the methodology to impart the features of architectural intelligence, through the analysis of a global heritage building that collected more than one generation and the impact on the annual visit rate of the building.

Keywords

References

  1. www.un.org.
  2. Sinopoli,j. (2010). " smart building systems for architects". owners and builders ,EL sevier ,inc.,united states، p47. .
  3. artdaily.com. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://artdaily.com/news/90763/Smithsonian-American-Art-Museum-releases--Renwick-Gallery-WONDER-360--virtual-reality-app#.W4r_us7XLIU.
  4. Leonard, C & et al. (2005). Intelligent Building Index. Hong kong: Asian Institute of intelligent buildings.
  5. Atkin, Brian. ((1988)). Progress Towards Intelligent Buildings. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Barrney, J.B. Brain. (1991). Resources and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Journal Management, p:102.
  7. Boyle, Katherine. (18 July 2013.). "Renwick modeled it after the Louvre's Tuileries addition". Washington Post.
  8. Caffrey,R. (2000). "building performance and occupant productivity". peronal Environment-Anew building focus. .fourth world congress.
  9. Comer, D. (2012). tourism and archeological heritage management. Springer, page 3.
  10. Daniel I. Prajogo and McDermott. (2011). Examining competitive priorities and competitive advantage in service organisations using Importance-Performance Analysis matrix. Vol. 21 Iss: 5, pp.465 – 483.
  11. Development Economic policy Refrain analysis project (DEPRA). (june1998). "Enhancing Egypt's Export" final report. subimitted by Nathan Associate, p. p9.
  12. Echols, Tucker. ( June 24, 2014.). "David Rubenstein Gives $5.4M for Renwick Gallery Renovation". Washington Business Journal.
  13. international cultural tourism charte ICOMOS. (1999). ICOMOS, international cultural tourism charter, managing tourism at places of heritage significance. managing tourism at places of heritage significance.
  14. Porter, M. (1980). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard business review.
  15. Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan press, LTD, New York, P55.
  16. Quaddus, J. Xu and M. (2013). Information Systems for Competitive Advantages.
  17. Sinopoil, J. (2010). smart building systems for Architects,owners,and Building. Elsevier press-An Imprint of Elsevier , oxford , uk, p1.
  18. UNCTAD. (1995). Environmen t,International Copetitivness and Development: Lessons From Empirial Studies. p. P.4.
  19. Wigginton, Michael & Harris, Jude. (2002). "intelligent skins". Architectural press,An Imprint of Elsevier, Linacre House ,Jordan Hill,Oxford,UK, p 39.
  20. wikipedia.org. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renwick_Gallery.
  21. wjla.com. تم الاسترداد من https://wjla.com/news/local/renwick-gallery-virtual-reality.
  22. www.architectmagazine.com. https://www.architectmagazine.com/technology/experiencing-burning-man-in-virtual-reality_.
  23. www.nps.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/wash/dc27.htm.
  24. www.wbdg.org. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.wbdg.org/additional-resources/case-studies/renwick-gallery.
  25. Yardley, William. (2013.). "Renwick Gallery of the Smithsonian American Art Museum". Washington Post.
  26. ابراهیم, ماجدة بدرأحمد. (2010). کمدخل لتطبیق التطورالتکنولوجیفی التحکم البیئی وترشید استهلاک الطاقة بالمبانی. مصر: رسالة ماجستیر ،قسم الهندسة المعماریة ،جامعة القاهرة.
  27. الجرف, منى طعیمة. (2002). مفهوم القدرة التنافسیة و محدداتها. مرکز البحوث والدراسات الإقتصادیة والمالیة، صفحة ص9.
  28. العیسوی،محمدعبد الفتاح أحمد. (نوفمبر, 2007). اقتصادیات التصمیم البیئی –نموذج لتصمیم بیئی اقتصادی وتأثیره علی المبانی. ص16 . مصر: قسم الهندسة المعماریة ،جامعة القاهرة ، رسالة دکتوراة.
  29. نویر، طارق. (2000). المزایا التنافسیة للصناعات الکمیاویة المصریة. مؤتمر القدرات التنافسیة للاقتصاد المصرى: افاق المستقبل نوفمبر2000 (صفحة ص96). مرکز الدراسات وبحوث الدول النامیة- کلیة الاقتصاد والعلوم السیاسیة- جامعة القاهرة.
  30. عبد الکریم ،نبیل غالب . (2008). الاتجاهات الحدیثة للتصمیم البیئی – نموذج للتصمیم البیئی وترشید الطاقة فی المبنی. مصر: رسالة ماجستیر، قسم الهندسة المعماریة،جامعة القاهرة.
  31. فیصل, المطیری. (2012). أثر التوجه البداعی على تحقیق میزة تنافسیة در اسة تطبیقیة على البنوک التجا ریة الکویتیة. الأردن-عمان: جامعة الشرق الاوسط ، الأردن.
  32.  نویر, طارق. (2001). الوضع التنافسی للصناعات الکیماویة فی مصر فی ضوء التطورات المحلیة والعالمیة الجدیدة. رسالة دکتوراه ، جامعة الزقازیق ،کلیة التجارة، صفحة ص53.
  33. حجازی، یاسمین صبری محمود (2016).استخدام إنترنت الاشیاء کأداة لتحقیق تنافسیة السیاحة الإبداعیة بمناطق التراث بمدینة الفیوم" موتمر ثقافات المتوسط فی الفنون والعمارة، کلیة فنون جمیلة جامعة الاسکندریة، ص1.
  34. یوسف, علی خالد علی. (2006). العمارة الذکیة صیاغة معاصرة للعمارة المحلیة. ص 23. اسیوط: رسالة دکتوراه ،کلیة هندسة ،جامعة أسیوط.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics