The Aesthetics of Augmented Reality as an up to date approach to creative artistic expression

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Lecturer in Advertising Department, Faculty of Applied Arts, 6 October University,

Abstract

Over the past few years, there are many fields in which augmented reality has been applied through entertainment, culture and digital arts. With this rapid development of augmented reality in modern technological practices, there are a need to ask what augmented reality means as a new method of artistic expression and how it can enrich the creative field.
The research aims to re-evaluate the possibilities of augmented reality for artistic expression in the current age and the ability to generate new ways to perceive the recipient or user and to highlight the ambivalence of the user in interpretation as a major feature of the augmented reality(AR) art.
The research also discusses the implications of the future use of augmented reality in art resulting from the possibilities and problems to continue the artistic creativity in this field, Included visual space and sensory and interactive methods
The results of the study indicate the real interaction in (AR) art is the empowerment of machines for expression between the participant and the (AR) works, in addition to the changing role of the participant in the artworks also augmented reality art allows the user to express himself through the work itself and also enables new forms of representation.

Keywords


  1.  Alsione svx. Stay with Miku in augmented reality, web: Youtube video documentation, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRWKFauD6_w

  2. Berry B, Poupyrev I. Augmented groove. ATR Research Labs, Kyoto, Japan http://www.mic.atr. co.jp/sspace/ (1999).

  3.  Christa Sommerer and Laurent Mignonneau Interactive Art Research , Vienna: Springer verlage , 2009.

  4. Darf Design (Sahar Fikouhi and Arta Toulami). Hermaton documentation website.

  5. http:// www.darfdesign.com/132812/1318702/gallery/hermaton (2020).

  6.  Errki Huhtamo, “Tactile and Haptic Interaction in the Works of Sommerer & Mignonneau,” in Stocker, Sommerer, and Mignonneau, eds., 33.

  7. Erik P.Bucy ,( Interactivity in society ) locating an Elusive concept , The Information Socity 20 . 2004,376.

  8. Gibson W. Spook country. New York: Berkley , 2007

  9. Holmes K. Hermaton: enter the grid is an augmented reality architectural maze. Web: http://thecreatorsproject.vice.com/blog/ihermaton-enter-the-gridi-anaugmented-reality-maze (2013).

  10.  Intracom. Archeoguide Website http://archeoguide.intranet.gr/project.htm

  11.  J.Burnham, “Systems Esthetics”, Artforum 7, No. 1 30--35 (1968)

  12.  Jens F., Jensen, (Interactivity : Tracing a new concept in media and communication studies , Nordicom Review 19 , 1 , 1998.201

  13.  JimVallino, “Introduction to Augmented Reality,” DOI= http://www.se.rit.edu/~jrv/research/ar/.

  14.  John Dewy ( Art as Experience ) 1934.

  15.  Kato H, Billinghurst M. Marker tracking and HMD calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM international workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR 99), October, 1999.

  16.  Nicolas Bourriaud (Rellatioal Aesthetics ) les Presses du Reel Dijon , 1998.

  17. Rafael Lozano-Hemmer, “Pulse Park,” DOI= http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/english/projects/pulsepark.htm.
  18. Rancière the politics of aesthetics: the distribution of the sensible. Culture Machine, Reviews(2004).

  19.  Ronald Azuma, (Asurvey of Augmented Reality ) Presense: Teleperators and virtual Enviroments 6 , No. 4355- 385 1997.

  20.  Ronald Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, and B. MacIntyre, “Recent Advances in Augmented Reality,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 6 (Nov./Dec. 2001), 34. DOI= http://www.cs.unc.edu/~azuma/cga2001.
  21. Roy Ascott, “Absorption in the Art of Sommerer & Mignonneau,” in Stocker, Sommerer, and Mignonneau, eds., 194.