Helmy Almaz, A. (2022). The impact of anthropometrics on the functional design of office furniture. International Design Journal, 12(5), 21-30. doi: 10.21608/idj.2022.260291
Amira Fawzy Helmy Almaz. "The impact of anthropometrics on the functional design of office furniture". International Design Journal, 12, 5, 2022, 21-30. doi: 10.21608/idj.2022.260291
Helmy Almaz, A. (2022). 'The impact of anthropometrics on the functional design of office furniture', International Design Journal, 12(5), pp. 21-30. doi: 10.21608/idj.2022.260291
Helmy Almaz, A. The impact of anthropometrics on the functional design of office furniture. International Design Journal, 2022; 12(5): 21-30. doi: 10.21608/idj.2022.260291
The impact of anthropometrics on the functional design of office furniture
Architecture Department Faculty of Engineering Horus University in Egypt
Abstract
The science of anthropology is concerned with the biological, cultural, and social diversity of people. Man is viewed as a biological and social being with the unique power to create and build culture. Human biology and culture make up the first two axes of anthropology, time makes up the third. It is necessary to define anthropology as a separate field. It is the field of science that investigates how human beings produce things. Anthropology seeks to comprehend man by investigating a wide range of scientific issues that are related to one another and linked by a common science. Anthropometrics is the study of body proportions and other physical attributes. It is concerned with information concerning the size and shape of the human body and is used in industrial design, garment design, ergonomics, and architecture. Anthropometric data is displayed inside a design table demonstrating the average measures of the human figure, affected by ergonomic tools for the human shape, and used to explain the user or target scope of the design. The research aims to assess the office furniture using anthropometric factors of the sitting posture. And the use of data collection and anthropometric measurements of the sitting position, the study of areas of discomfort, and the study of postural deficiencies, particularly in office furniture, make it essential for the furniture to have an ergonomic design and ergonomic compatibility in size. Body discomfort was assessed using anthropometric factors. Little attention has been paid to ergonomic concerns in their contact with users, particularly about office furniture, making it critical that the furniture has an ergonomic design and an appropriate size.
1) Associates. A. R. T. H. D. (1993). The Measure of man and woman: human factors in design. New York: Whitney Library of Design.
2) Bridger, R. (2017). Introduction to Human Factors and Ergonomics, Fourth Edition. (Vol. 4). Electronic books: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
3) Brinkerhoff, B. N. (2009). Ergonomics: design, integration, and implementation. New York: New York: Nova Science.
4) Clements- Croome, D. (2018). Creating the productive workplace: places to work creatively. London; New York: Routledge.
5) Committee, H. F. a. E. S. H. (2004). Guidelines for Using Anthropometric, Data in Product Design, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (Print book: English View all editions and formats ed.): Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6) Dowell William, F. Y., Brian H Green (2001). Office Seating Behaviors an Investigation of Posture, Task, and Job Type. the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45(16), 1245-1248.
7) Grandjean, E. (1997). Fitting the task to the man: a textbook of occupational ergonomics (Vol. 5). K.H.E. Kroemer and E. Grandjean.: London; New York: Taylor & Francis.
8) Gupta; N. Z. D. (2020). Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design (Vol. 2nd): Oxford Woodhead Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier.
9) Haslegrave, S. P. C. M. (2006.). Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics, and the design of work (Vol. 3): Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
10) Islam Rafaat Mohamed, A. F. H. A. (2021). Humanistic and Interactive Methodology in Architecture as a Design Indicator for Human Space. design engineering (Toronto)(9), 2398 - 2415.
11) Janari, H. P. A. E. A. D. (2015). Elementary school desk and chair design based on focus group discussion. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology and Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical and Chemical Engineering (ICEVT & IMECE)- IEEE, Indonesia Surakarta
12) John A Roebuck, J. (1995). Anthropometric methods: designing to fit the human body: Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13) Landry, M. R. L. S. J. (2013). Introduction to human factors and ergonomics for engineers: Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
14) Matthew B. Parkinson, M. P. R. (2006). Improved head restraint design for safety and compliance. Paper presented at the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
15) Nag, P. K. (2019). Office Buildings: Health, Safety, and Environment: Singapore: Springer Singapore.
16) G Akanbi, N. S. O. O. N. (2018). Regression models for predicting anthropometric measurements of students needed for ergonomics school furniture design. Ergonomics SA: Journal of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa, 28(1(20160801)), 38-56.
View on SCiNiTO
Top