تأثیر البلاغة المرئیة والتفکیر البصری على إدراک الإعلان الخارجی

• سمیة محمد محمد عیسى: مداخل تشکیلیة معاصرة لتصمیم الملصق الإرشادی فی ضوء فلسفة المأثور الشعبی المصری، رسالة دکتوراه غیر منشورة، کلیة التربیة النوعیة، جامعة عین شمس -2006،  ص 189
• شاکر عبد الحمید -عصر الصورة – عالم المعرفة – ینایر 2005م- ص147-148
  • شاکر عبد الحمید – الفنون البصریة وعبقریة الإدراک –الهیئة المصریة العامة للکتاب – 2008- ص 229
  • مخلوف حمیدة : سلطة الصورة ، دار سحر للنشر ،  تونس ،  2004، ص 18.
  • Baker, William E. and Richard J. Lutz (2000), "An Empirical Test of an Updated Relevance-Accessibility Model of Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Advertising, XXIX (1), 1-14.
  • Barthes, Roland., (1964), Rhétorique de l’image, Communications n°4, 40-51.
  • Berlyne, Daniel.E. (1960) in Olney, Thomas.J., Holbrook, Morris.B. and Batra, Rajeev. (1991), Consumer Responses to Advertising: The Effects of Ad Content, Emotions and Attitude Toward the Ad on Viewing Time, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 4, 440-453.
  • Bonsiepe, Gui. 1999b. Interface: an approach to design. Maastricht: Jan van Eyck Akademie.
  • Boutlis, Paulie (2000), "A Theory of Postmodern Advertising," International Journal of Advertising, 19 (1), 3-23.
  • Campelo, A.; Aitken, R.; Gnoth, J., (2011), Visual Rhetoric and Ethics in Marketing of a Destination, Journal of Travel Research, 50, 1, 3-14.
  • Durand, Jacques., (1970), Rhétorique et image publicitaire, Communications, n°15, 70-95.
  • Ehninger , Douglas. Contemporary Rhetoric : A Reader’s Coursebook. Glenview:Scott,Foreman,1972.print.
  • Foss, Sonja K. “Ambiguity as Persuasion: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial.” Communication Quarterly 34.3 (1986): 326-340. Print.
  • Hollis, Richard (2001). Graphic Design – A Concise History. London: Thames & Hudson.
  • Johar, G. V., Holbrook, M. B. & Stern, B. B. (2001) The role of myth in creative advertising design:theory, process and outcome, Journal of Advertising, XXX(2), pp. 1–25.

Journal of Marketing Communications, 12(1), 49-61.

• Kinross, Robin. 1989. ‘The rhetoric of neutrality.’ in Design discourse: history/theory/criticism, edited by Margolin, Victor, 373–385. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• McQuarrie, Edward.F. and Mick, David.G., (1999), Visual Rhetoric in ²Advertising: Text Interpretive, Experiential, and Reader-Response Analyses, Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 6, 37-54.
• Mick, E., Mcquarrie, F., & Glen, D. (2003). Visual and verbal rhetorical figures under directed processing versus incidental exposure to  advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (4), 579-587. 
• Moriarty, Sandra E. (1996), "Abduction and a Theory of Visual Interpretation,"
• Scott, L. M. (1994a). Image in Advertising : The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric. The Journal of Consumer Research,  21, 252-273.
• Scott, Linda M. (1994), "Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual  Rhetoric," Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252-273.
• Tom, Gail, and Anmarie Eves. “The Use of Rhetorical Devices in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 39.4 (1999): 39-43. Print. University of North Carolina Press.
• Williamson , Judith; Decoding advertisement , Marion Boyars , London 2002 p25.