السمات التشکيلية للإضاءة في الفيلم ومدى تأثيرها على الاستجابة العاطفية للجمهور "دراسة تجريبية مطبقة"

نوع المستند : Original Article

المؤلف

قسم الإعلام ، کلية اللغة والإعلام - القرية الذکية ، الأکاديمية العربية للعلوم والتکنولوجيا والنقل البحري ، مصر

المستخلص

تبحث الدراسة في تأثير السمات التشکيلية لأنماط الإضاءة على الاستجابات العاطفية للجمهور ، والأنماط المقصودة هي الإضاءة العالية High Key ، والإضاءة المنخفضة Low Key ، والإضاءة المتاحة Available Light ، وقد تم اختيارها بناءً على نظرية الفيلم ، تجمع الدراسة بين تأثيرات الوسائط المرئية والدراسات الأدبية للفيلم لدراسة تأثير العناصر التشکيلية على الجمهور بشکل تجريبي ، وقد تم إجراء تجربة عملية بالتلاعب في مستويات الإضاءة ، وتتضح مشکلة البحث في الإجابة على السؤال: هل سيؤثر شعور المشارکون باختلاف أنماط الإضاءة على اختلاف الاستجابة العاطفية مع الأحداث والشخصيات ومدى القبول؟ ، وتتضح أهمية الدراسة من خلال توفير نتائج من شأنها أن تضيف إلى فهم السمات التشکيلية في الوسائط المرئية ، والهدف من البحث هو إثبات صحة الافتراضات النظرية للفيلم فيما يتعلق بقدرة الضوء على تشکيل الاستجابات العاطفية من خلال أدلة تجريبية ، تم الحصول على علاقة واضحة بين أنماط الإضاءة المختلفة والاستجابة العاطفية للجمهور ، حيث أبلغ المشارکون الذين شاهدوا مشهد الإضاءة المنخفضة Low Key عن مزيد من مشاعر الغموض والتشويق ، وغيرها من المشاعر المضطربة المرتبطة بالإضاءة المنخفضة للمشهد ، ومن المثير للدهشة أن الإضاءة المنخفضة أيضًا قد أثارت أيضًا مستويات أعلى من الاستجابة العاطفية في مشاعر أکثر إيجابية ، وعلى الرغم من أن هذه مجرد دراسة تجريبية للاستجابات العاطفية فيما يتعلق بأسلوب إضاءة الفيلم ، فقد تم العثور على نتائج هامة ويجب إجراء مزيد من الدراسات لتطوير قاعدة بيانات وتقديم المزيد من الدعم للنتائج في هذه الدراسة حيث تشير النتائج إلى وجود علاقة بين إضاءة الفيلم والاستجابة العاطفية التي تمت الإشارة إليها في الدراسات الأدبية للفيلم.

الكلمات الرئيسية


1.     AL-Smadi M. and Tomberg V., (2013) Advances in Web-Based Learning –ICWL 2013, 12th International Conference Kenting, Taiwan, October 2013 Proceedings Harnessing the Potential of Accessibility Standards and Responsive Web Design Practices to Achieve Learning Interoperability on the Level of the User Interface. pp. (294–305). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
2.     Aizpurua A., Arrue M., and Vigo M., (2015) “Prejudices, Memories, Expectations and Confidence Influence Experienced Accessibility on the Web,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 51, 2015, pp. 152–160.
3.     Anbu J., and Kataria S., (2015) Access to library resources through portable devices: A pre-design prototype for creating library websites. 1-5. 10.1109/ETTLIS.2015.7048162.
4.     Ayres P., and Sweller J. (2005) The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 135-146). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.     Bang H., and Wojdynski B., (2016) Tracking users' visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 55, Part B, 2016, Pages 867-876, ISSN 0747-5632, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.025.
6.     Baturay M., and Birtane M. (2013) Responsive Web Design: A New Type of Design for Web-based Instructional Content. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 106, pp. (2275-2279). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2013.12.259
7.     Beck D.M., and Lavie N., (2005) Look Here but Ignore What You See: Effects of Distractors at Fixation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 592–607,
8.     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.592
9.     Bull J., and McKenna C., (2004) Blueprint for Computer-assisted Assessment. Routledge Chapman & Hall.
10.  Cartwright-Finch U., and Lavie N., (2007) The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness, Cognition, Volume 102, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 321-340, ISSN 0010-0277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.002.
11.  Deng L., and Poole M.S., (2010) Affect in Web Interfaces: A Study of the Impacts of Web Page Visual Complexity and Order, MIS Q. 34, 711–730. doi:Article
12.  Desimone R., Duncan J., (1995) Annual Review of Neuroscience, Pages 193-222, ISSN  - 0147-006X, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
13.  Eysenck M.W., Derakshan N., Santos R., & Calvo M.G., (2007) Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336 353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
14.  Feldman, R. S. (2016) Child Development (7th ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson.
15.  Fielding, J. (2014) The experts voice in web development. Beginning Responsive Web Design with HTML5 and CSS3. California: Apress Media.
16.  Geissler G.,  Zinkhan G., & Watson R.T., (2006) The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent, Journal of Advertising, 35 (2) (2006), pp. 69-80
17.  Galitz W.O., (2002) The Essential Guide to User Interface Design an Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken.
18.  Germonprez M., and Zigurs I., (2003) Causal Factors for Web Site Complexity, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 3 (13) (2003), pp. 3-13
19.  Ginns P., (2006) Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects, Journal ofLearning and Instruction Volume 16, Issue 6, December 2006, Pages 511-525
20.  Haag J., and Berking P., (2015) A Reference Model for Designing Mobile Learning and Performance Support, Corpus ID: 27644512
21.  Holst C., (2012) Adaptive vs. responsive layouts and optimal form field labels, 2012, http://uxdesign.smashingmagazine.com/2012/11/08/ux-design-qa-with-christian-holst
22.  Hoober S., and Shank P., (2014) “Making mLearning Usable: How We Use Mobile Devices.” The eLearning Guild, April, 2014.
23.  Hurst J.E., (2018) Evaluating Health and Wellness Mobile Applications, Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 18:3, 266-278, DOI: 10.1080/15323269.2018.1472928
24.  Jehl S., (2014) Responsible Responsive Design, A Book Apart.
25.  Katajisto L., (2015) "Creating support content for responsive websites at Microsoft Mobile," 2015 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), Limerick, Ireland, 2015, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/IPCC.2015.7235787
26.  Lavie N., and De Fockert J.W. (2003) Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 202–212 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194795
27.  Learning Enhancement Corporation., (2010) The Relationship Between Vision and Cognition. Chicago.
28.  Lestari D.M., Hardiano D., & Hidayanto A.N. (2014) Analysis of User Experience Quality on ResponsiveWeb Design from Its Informative Perspective. Int’I J. Software Eng. And Its Applications. 8 (5) 53-62.
29.  Sauro J. and Lewis J., (2016) Quantifying the use experience, practical statistics for user research, Published by Elsevier.
30.  McEwen R., and Dubé A. (2015) Engaging or Distracting: Children’s Tablet Computer Use in Education. Technology & Society, 18 (4), pp. 9–23.
31.  Merriënboer J., and Sweller J., (2010) Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x
32.  Merriman J., (2008) Redefining interoperability Or why the IEEE and Oxford English Dictionary have it Wrong. Retrieved from: http:// www.okiproject.org/view/
33.  Nebeling M., and Norrie M. (2013) Web Engineering, 13th International Conference, ICWE 2013 Aalborg, Denmark, July 2013. Responsive Design and Development: Methods, Technologies and Current Issues. F. Daniel, P. Dolog, and Q. Li Eds.: ICWE 2013. pp. 510–513. Heidelberg: pringer-Verlag Berlin.
34.    Norris C.A., and Soloway E., (2015) “Mobile Technology in 2020: Predictions and Implications for K–12 Education.” Educational Technology, vol. 55, no. 1, 2015, pp. 12–19. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44430334.
35.  Palkova Z,. (2015) Mobile Web 2.0 Tools and Applications in Online Training and Tutoring. 10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_73.
36.  Pekka J., et al., (2015) On the design of a responsive user interface for a multi-device web service, Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems, (pp. 60-63). Florence, Italy: IEEE.
37.  Rekhi S., (2013) Square pegs and round holes: How to make e-learning more mobile responsive. Retrieved from http://www.saffroninteractive.com/square-pegs-and-round-holes/on 19.06.2013.
38.  Rocheleau J., (2017) https://designmodo.com/desktop-first-design-responsive/
39.  Scalf P.E., Torralbo A., Tapia E., & Beck D.M., (2013) Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories. Front. Psychol. 4:243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00243
40.  Schubert U., Grob M., & Potzsch S., (2012) User Experience and User-Centered Design at DATEV eG. In: Maedche A., Botzenhardt A., Neer L. (eds) Software for People. Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31371-4_10
41.  Sharki C., and Fisher A., (2013) Jump Start Responsive Web Design. Sitepoint Pty. Ltd: Australia.
42.  Shepherd E., (2006) IGI Global 2006. Definitions, Uses and Benefits of Standards. In: Online Assessment and Measurement: Foundations and Challenges. pp. 67–85.
43.  Stoces M., Masner J., Jarolímek J., Šimek P., Vaněk J., & Ulman M., (2015) 11th International Conference Mobile Learning 2015. cross- platform user interface of e-learning Applications. (pp. 135-138). Prague: Czech Republic.
44.  Sweller J., Editor(s): Jose P. Mestre, Brian H. Ross, (2011) CHAPTER TWO - Cognitive Load Theory, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Academic Press, Volume 55, 2011, Pages 37-76, ISSN 0079-7421, ISBN 9780123876911, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8.
45.  Torralbo A., & Beck D., (2008) Defining perceptual load: The role of local competitive interactions in visual cortex. Visual Cognition, 16(8), 1131-1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280802478990
46.  Tuch A.N., Bargas-Avila J.A., Opwis K. & Wilhelm F.H., (2009) Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users’ experience, physiology, performance, and memory, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67, 703–715. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.04.002.
47.  Usablenet, (2015) The Truth About Responsive Web Design. http://blog. usablenet.com/the-truth-about-responsive-web-design-white-paper.
48.  Voutilainen J., Salonen J. & Mikkonen T., (2015) "On the Design of a Responsive User Interface for a Multi-device Web Service," 2015 2nd ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems, Florence, Italy, 2015, pp. 60-63, doi: 10.1109/MobileSoft.2015.16.
49.  Wang Q., Yang S., Liu M., Cao Z., & Ma Q., (2014) An eye-tracking study of website complexity from cognitive load perspective, Decision Support Systems, Volume 62, 2014, Pages 1-10, ISSN 0167-9236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.02.007.
50.  Wroblewski L. (2011) Mobile first. 1st edition. New York: A Book Apart.
51.  Xuan C., Wenbin W. , Junyan L., Zewen F., & Gang C. (2015) Responsive Mobile Micro lecture Online Learning Platform under MOOC Model. The 10th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE 2015), July (pp. 22-24). Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge University, UK
52.  Zalatan K., "BrainLeaf Inc.," (2017) https://www.brainleaf.com/blog/brainleaf -news/mobile-first-vs-desktop-first- how-to-choose-a-responsive-strategy.
Zhu B., (2013) "Responsive Design: e-Learning Site Transformation," 2013 Fourth International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing, 2013, pp. 126-130, doi: 10.1109/ICNDC.2013.41.